On Thursday, December 4, 2014 2:09:11 PM UTC, [email protected] wrote: > > The Hindu cycles seem more plausible then the Quran, Soonah, and Bukhari. > Yet, no faith describes how the night sky appears and how it got that way. >
Nor Science. The blackness is subject to a range of speculation. It adds up by one reading, but consistency is lost again no sooner than won, by facing the wrong way to another reading. E.g. Physical law doesn't derive from negative, hence absence of light. But the cosmological interpretation worldview situates every point in the universe with the same effect we get where we are - in the middle, everything expanding way. Making the universe effectively infinite and homogenous. That isn't necessarily the view of everyone, but there's no alternative answer in play either. But the consequence for that should be a lot more light. So your point is square for the faiths, philosophies and Science alike. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
