On 2/26/2015 7:05 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
But it assumes the Born rule provides the relative measure - which is more
than just
the SWE. You can solve the problem of branch counting by assuming
infinitely many
parallel worlds - but then that raises the problem of defining
"probability".
There's no problem defining probability. There is, however, a big problem
defining collapse.
No, problem. You apply the projection operator in the measurement basis. Not having a
classical picture in your imagination is not the same as not having a definition....
There are plenty of phenomenon in science that are non-linear.
Not in the reality, if the reality is described by quantum mechanics.
But QM is inconsistent with GR - so it is not a given that QM is completely
correct.
QM stands on firmer ground that GR. And is GR non-linear?
Yes, gravity gravitates.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
