Chaotica Delenda Est!
-----Original Message----- From: 'scerir' via Everything List <[email protected]> To: everything-list <[email protected]> Sent: Sun, Jun 28, 2015 5:38 am Subject: R: Re: A riddle for John Clark True randomness is not computable by (at least one) definition of "random". But a good pseudo-random number generator would not be detectable for many steps (SFMT period = 2^216091). -Brent That reminds me of Saint Thomas Aquinas: "Therefore, it is not contrary to divine providence that there are some fortuitous and chance events among things." - "Non est igitur divinae providentiae contrarium quod sint aliqua fortuita et casualia in rebus.", in 'Contra Gentiles', III, 74, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
