On 14 Apr 2016, at 20:25, 'scerir' via Everything List wrote:
MWI: "local" or not?
There are papers *trying* to explain "local" in MWI. In example:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/504/2/cracow.pdf
That's a good one, imo.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0909.2673v3.pdf
I will read this one by Rubin asap. It might make precise what I just
said to Bruce.
http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/quant-ph/0103079
Thanks. Will take a look asap. I hope it could help Clark and Bruce.
Note that with computationalism, we might still expect some physical
non-locality, and so it is my "physical intuition" which makes me
skeptical. Despite I think that physics is only an appearance emerging
from arithmetic see from inside by computable objects, I tend to infer
from observation and reasoning that both QM and special relativity are
plausibly correct, together with some minimal amount of physical
realism (but not physical fundamentalism). Non locality would hurt
badly that feeling. Physics would no more have any relation with a
reality independent of ourself, and would go farer in weirdness than
what we can expect from digital mechanism!
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
