Here is a paper from the Journal of Cosmology, written by a comp sci professor at the University of Warwick, UK. I like it because of its logical flow, and, of course, no idea if its plausible, but it does correlate with MWI and the wave function, observers, and all that fun stuff of physics and computationalism. Anyone want to test drive this hypothesis and the logics? I like it, but don't know if this helps us?
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:gSwPx43hKBsJ:journalofcosmology.com/JOC24/Forrest_Paper_2.pdf+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us -----Original Message----- From: Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com> Sent: Fri, Apr 29, 2016 8:19 am Subject: Re: R: Re: R: Re: Non-locality and MWI On 29 Apr 2016, at 09:41, 'scerir' via Everything List wrote: Da: spudboy100 via Everything List <everything-list@googlegroups.com> Data: 28/04/2016 21.46 A: <everything-list@googlegroups.com> Ogg: Re: R: Re: Non-locality and MWI Is there any practical technical use for MWI as applied science. Just asking? Dunno. Quantum computers? Maybe there is a Many Interpretations Conjecture :-) Interpretations of quantum mechanics, unlike Gods, are not jealous, and thus it is safe to believe in more than one at the same time. Well, only because we tolerate non-sense in religion. I am not sure we can do that for a long time. So if the many-worlds interpretation makes it easier to think about the research you're doing in April, and the Copenhagen interpretation makes it easier to think about the research you're doing in June, the Copenhagen interpretation is not going to smite you for praying to the many-worlds interpretation. At least I hope it won't, because otherwise I'm in big trouble. ---Peter Shor Same with religion. We need only to have, relatively to the facts, consistent views, with ourselves, and eventually with each others. I believe in every interpretation of quantum mechanics to the extent it points out the problem, and disbelieve in every interpretation to the extent it claims to have solved it. Good! I believe the same for the religions. Bruno --Scott Aaronson -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
