Not sure about Smolin's theory making a comeback. His idea depended on the notion of black holes spawning new universes, with each BH tweaking the laws of physics slightly in the new universe. But black hole theory has progressed a lot since then and I don't think anything in the modern theories allows for them to spawn new universes.
On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 at 12:17:48 PM UTC+10, Russell Standish wrote: > > Nice idea! And I like your prediction of many more LIGO events being > detected. > > One postscript is that this plays in nicely with Smolin's evolutionary > universe idea, that predicts we should be living in a universe > optimised for black hole creation. If this idea of primordial black > holes pays off, then it would be time to dust off Smolin's proposal > again. > > Cheers > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 01:07:11PM -0400, John Clark wrote: > > I would give 50% odds that the mystery of Dark Matter has been solved > and > > it will turn out not to be some new particle but will consist of > Primordial > > Black Holes. We know from the percentage of the elements Hydrogen, > > Deuterium, Helium and Lithium how much regular matter was around one > > minute after the Big Bang when nucleosynthesis cooked up these elements, > > and there is no room for Dark Matter. So the Black Holes that form the > bulk > > of the Dark Matter can't have come from the corpses of dead stars made > of > > regular matter; but maybe Black Holes formed long before nucleosynthesis > > occurred when the universe was much less than one minute old and things > > were too hot for even protons to exist much less elements. > > > > Stephen Hawking proposed this explanation for Dark Matter some years ago > > but the idea had fallen out of favor because it was largely (but not > > entirely) ruled out by the data. We know that to account for all the > Dark > > Matter the Black Holes can't be larger than 100 solar masses because > there > > would be more gravitational microlensing than we observe. And we know > that > > to account for all the Dark Matter the Black Holes can't be smaller than > 10 > > solar masses because we'd see Black Hole explosions /evaporations (if > they > > were REALLY small) and the orbits of widely spaced binary stars would be > > disrupted, but we don't see any of that. > > > > There is still a window for Primordial Black Holes being Dark Matter > that > > the data hasn't excluded and it's between 10 and 100 solar masses, and > > during its short engineering run that's just what LIGO discovered. It > found > > a 29 solar mass Black Hole merging with a 36 solar mass Black Hole in a > > fifth of a second producing a 62 solar mass black hole and 3 solar > masses > > of energy in the form of Gravitational Waves. Everybody was amazed they > > found something that good so quickly when the instrument hadn't even > > reached its design sensitivity yet, everybody thought it would take > years > > of observing to detect a thing like that. Maybe they just got > > extraordinarily lucky, or maybe Black Holes are far far more common than > > had been previously thought. Maybe 85% of all the matter in the universe > is > > in the form of Primordial Black Holes. > > > > Primordial Black Holes could solve another mystery too. Astronomers have > > found a 12 billion solar mass supermassive Black Hole that existed just > 900 > > million years after the Big Bang, and they've had a very hard time > > explaining how a Black Hole could get that big so quickly from the > merger > > of much smaller Stellar Black Holes that were produced from dead stars. > But > > if you had 100 solar mass Black Holes around since day one, and if they > > were very very common, in fact if 85% of all matter in the universe was > in > > that form, then the creation of a 12 billion solar mass Black Hole just > 900 > > million years later is much easier to explain. > > > > The two LIGO detectors will get back online in September and with > greatly > > improved sensitivity and will be joined by a third detector, VIRGO near > > Pisa in Italy. So we should know pretty soon if Dark Matter and Black > Holes > > are the same thing, if they are then the second greatest mystery in > physics > > will have been solved, but we'll still have the mystery of Dark Energy. > > > > > > John K Clark > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Everything List" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > <javascript:>. > > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Dr Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) > Principal, High Performance Coders > Visiting Senior Research Fellow [email protected] > <javascript:> > Economics, Kingston University http://www.hpcoders.com.au > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
