That would imply that people in sensory deprivation tanks would dream. I don't think they do though they experience sensory illusions.

Of course the interesting question is why do we sleep. When you're asleep you're not actually deprived of sensory perception. Most people will awake instantly if you whisper their name. And dreaming only takes place during part of sleep. I suspect it has something to do with condensing and encoding the days experiences into long-term memory.

Brent


On 8/28/2016 9:07 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
Why do we dream? I think it is because the brain is a dreaming machine.

Waking life is merely a dream kept roughly in sync with reality through clues passed in from the senses.

Jason

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I have found a nice paper

    Jan Westerhoff, What it Means to Live in a Virtual World Generated
    by Our Brain, Erkenntnis (2016) 81:507–528

    The author considers the logical consequences from the theory that
    the brain generates a virtual world. Below is how Richard Dawkins
    describes the theory in his book Unweaving the Rainbow

    "We move through a virtual world of our own brains’ making. Our
    constructed models of rocks and of trees are a part of the
    environment in which we animals live, no less than the real rocks
    and trees that they represent."

    "There is an easy way to demonstrate that the brain works as a
    sophisticated virtual reality computer. First, look about you by
    moving your eyes. As you swivel your eyes, the images on your
    retinas move as if you were in an earthquake. But you don’t see an
    earthquake. To you, the scene seems as steady as a rock. I am
    leading up, of course, to saying that the virtual model in your
    brain is constructed to remain steady."

    Other proponents of the theory are Thomas Metzinger and Steven Lehar.

    Westerhoff offers three accounts for such a theory: strong, weak
    and irrealism. They differ from each other on the account of an
    external world.

    The strong account implies a structural correspondence between the
    virtual and external world. The week account just says that the
    external world exists but one can add almost nothing to this end.

    Irrealism on the other hand states the the external world is a
    part of the virtual world. I guess that Bruno's theory is close to
    irrealism.

    Evgeny

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "Everything List" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:everything-list%[email protected]>.
    To post to this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    Visit this group at
    https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
    <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
    <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to