I can't wait to dig into this. On Friday, January 27, 2017 at 7:02:13 PM UTC-5, hal Ruhl wrote: > > > Hi Everyone: > > Its been a while since I posted. > > I would like to start a thread to discuss the Second Law of Thermodynamics > and the possibility that its origins can be found in perhaps my model, or > comp, or their combination. > > As references I will start with use are: > > "Time's Arrow: The Origin of Thermodynamic Behavior" , > 1992 by Micheal Mackey > > "Microscopic Dynamics and the Second Law of Thermodynamics" > 2001 by Michael Mackey. > > my model as it appears in my posts of March and April of 2014. > > My idea comes from the fact that almost all the real numbers fail to be > computable and this > causes computational termination and/or computational precision issues. > > This should make the operable phase space grainy. This ambiguity causes > entropy [system configuration uncertainty] to increase or stay the same > at each evolutionary [trajectory] step. > > The system should also not be reversible for the same reason. > > If correct, would [my Model,Comp] be observationally verified? > > Hal > > > > > > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
