On 8/22/2017 1:16 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 8/21/2017 4:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
The problem with everythingism is that one doesn't experience
everything.
Indeed. But that is a very general problem, and you could say "the
problem with physicalism is that we don't experience primary matter,
nor the whole physical reality.
But that's not a problem for physicalism.
Then it is not a problem for any "everything theory". Physicalism
included. Or explain better why it would be a problem for
"everythingism".
It's a problem for your version of everythingism, because you claim to
invert psychology and physics, i.e. to derive physics from from
psychology. But psychology only includes what is experienced. So this
entails that everything is experienced or derived from experience.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
