An interesting point.  But then the question is which is it better to have good intuition or good intelligence.  Intelligence as self-consciousness in a typical alpha-beta game program would give explanations like "I projected all possible moves ahead for six steps and evaluated the positions according weighting algorithm Xyz and this move was the mini-max best."  Is that really any better than the neural net?  It seems that the function of self-consciousness must be a kind of learning, and in this cases social learning in which the person who has done well is asked to teach others how to do well.  If we were talking about AI robots then perhaps the robot who had done well could simply copy over its intuition network about the subject.  Humans can't do that, but as social animals they evolved to cooperate using language.  So they also teach and learn using language.  This means the even when their learning is intuitive (as in most sports) they create stories about how to perform well by trying to introspectively describe what they do intuitively.

Brent

On 10/22/2017 12:16 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Neural networks are not about artificial intelligence, but about artificial intuition. As you said, AlphaGo -a neural network application- can not answer the question why you did that move?.

If  they could answer, the answer would be ever the same: " I don´t know, I moved this because if found some patterns that are very close to this new one, so I did this move that produced a win at the end within those patterns".

That does not qualify as intelligence. For me, the appropriate name is  intuition.

2017-10-21 3:46 GMT+02:00 John Clark <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:

    Google reports in the current issue of the journal Nature that it
    has a new greatly improved Go program called  "AlphaGo Zero" that
    is now the most powerful GO program in the world. And the program
    isn't good because of brute force, it needs to make less than one
    tenth as many calculations as the previous best GO program
    "AlphaGo" that defeated the world's top human GO player in 2015  4
    games out of 5; and yet AlphaGo Zero just defeated AlphaGo in a
    100 game tournament 100 games to zero.

    Even more interesting is how AlphaGo Zero got so smart. The older
    program AlphaGo had to start by analyzing hundreds of thousands of
    championship level games made by human players, but AlphaGo Zero
    started with nothing but the simple rules of GO and instructions
    to learn to get better. At first the program was terrible but day
    by day it got better and after 40 days of thinking about the
    problem became the best at it in the world. But of course after 40
    days of constant self modification no human being can say how
     AlphaGo Zero works.

    https://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v550/n7676/full/nature24270.html
    <https://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v550/n7676/full/nature24270.html>

    It seems to me the next logical step would be to switch the
    program's interest from getting better at the game of GO to
    improving computer code, including its own. I wonder where that
    could lead.

     John K Clark
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "Everything List" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To post to this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    Visit this group at
    https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
    <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
    <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.




--
Alberto.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to