On 11/9/2017 6:23 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
The difference between spatially flat and asymptotically flat for a huge universe would be virtually impossible to distinguish by measuring the sum of angles in a triangle. Moreover, I don't see how spatially flat can have nothing to do with extent, since in applying Euclidean geometry we surely seem to be dealing with an infinitely extended plane. TIA.

Not necessarily.  You could have periodic boundary conditions.  But most cosmologists do assume the universe is infinite in spatial extent.  Of course the flatness isn't measured by triangulation. It's measured by comparing the spatial spectrum of the CMB variations to model predictions with different mass densities.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0004404

Brent


On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Brent Meeker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Cosmologist think the universe is spatially flat.  That just means
    triangles have interior angles summing to 180deg.  It doesn't have
    anything to do with extent.  But the universe is not flat in
    spacetime; it's expanding and at an increasing rate.

    Brent

    On 11/9/2017 3:10 PM, [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
    IIUC, the difference is huge. In the former case, the universe is
    open, spatially infinite with infinite mass (assuming a nonzero
    mass distribution on large scale everywhere), whereas the latter
    is closed, finite in spatial extent and mass. But I notice that
    most cosmologists claim the universe is *flat*, as in
    mathematically flat. Are they just speaking loosely and really
    mean the universe is ASYMPTOTICALLY flat? I find it contradictory
    for a universe which is finite in age, to be truly mathematically
    FLAT. TIA.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups "Everything List" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To post to this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    Visit this group at
    https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
    <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
    <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in
    the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
    To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
    https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/0XZFBcBdqYU/unsubscribe
    <https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/0XZFBcBdqYU/unsubscribe>.
    To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email
    to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To post to this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    Visit this group at
    https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
    <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
    <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to