On Sunday, November 12, 2017 at 1:42:13 PM UTC-7, [email protected] wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 4:42:45 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote:
>>
>> Cosmologist think the universe is spatially flat.  That just means 
>> triangles have interior angles summing to 180deg.  It doesn't have anything 
>> to do with extent.  But the universe is not flat in spacetime; it's 
>> expanding and at an increasing rate.
>>
>> Brent
>>
>
> I don't understand how a flat universe has nothing to do with extent.
>
> I don't understand the distinction; spatially flat (and therefore 
> presumably infinite in extent?), but not flat in spacetime. 
>
> Also, when it was discovered that the expansion is accelerating, did the 
> solutions of the field equations which allowed tunneling from a vacuum and 
> presumably automatically came with a positive CC (indicating expansion), 
> also automatically come with a spatially flat (and presumably infinite in 
> extent) geometry? Hard to grasp how a universe emerging from a vacuum could 
> start out spatially flat and therefore IMO infinite in extent.  
>
> TIA.
>

I must have committed some unforgivable crime. I am just not sure what, 
exactly, it was. I wrote to Ned Wright and Lawrence Krauss, asking how a 
universe of finite age could be infinite in spatial extent. Including you, 
Brent, I am 0 for 3. I suppose the answer could be that it tunneled out of 
the Multiverse, and was infinite in spatial extent at that initial time. 
Hard to imagine such an event. 

>
>> On 11/9/2017 3:10 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> IIUC, the difference is huge. In the former case, the universe is open, 
>> spatially infinite with infinite mass (assuming a nonzero mass distribution 
>> on large scale everywhere), whereas the latter is closed, finite in spatial 
>> extent and mass. But I notice that most cosmologists claim the universe is 
>> *flat*, as in mathematically flat. Are they just speaking loosely and 
>> really mean the universe is ASYMPTOTICALLY flat? I find it contradictory 
>> for a universe which is finite in age, to be truly mathematically FLAT. TIA.
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to