On 3/2/2018 11:05 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
But you're now confounding provable and true and using "existence" in
the sense of satisfying axioms as though it mean the same as in
The UD exist and is emulated in the same sense that the prime numbers
are distributed in some ways.
I am just clear. In the ontology only 0, s(0), …. exists. It is the
whole point that when we assume that consciousness is invariant for
some digital transformation, you would need to reify matter and
attribute it some magical (Non Turing emulable, nor FPI-recoverable)
property to make some computations more real than other,
Sometimes I wonder if you know how science works. It doesn't make
assumptions that contradict observations, it makes observations and
tries form theories that match. It is a simple trivial observation that
some computations are more real than others. That observation doesn't
require reifying matter or assuming anything magical. It's an observation.
where in fact on the the self-referentially correct measure can be
obtained by mathematical means, and then we can compare with Nature.
Up to now, Arithmetic + its internal physical/material phenomenologies
fits the facts,
Like all computations exist? I think not.
where physics still dismiss the first person (despite the tremendous
progress made by Galileo, Einstein and Everett, or people like
Boscovic or Rossler).
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.