## Advertising

On 3/11/2018 10:06 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:

That's false. You implicitly and without proof or ever evidence assume that mathematics, computation, and abstractions like numbers exist,I have to assume them because the notion of computation needs them to be defined mathematically. Now if you deny that the equation x + 1 = 2 has no solution, I have a problem, but I am pretty sure you agree that such a solution exist.

`You know very well that is a disingenuous play on words. Satisfying a`

`formula is not existence. Otherwise we could write (looks like a horse`

`with a narwhal horn) = x and since it is satisfied by x=unicorn we`

`have proven that unicorns exist.`

Brent

After that, the reasoning show that assuming more existing things in the ontology cannot work.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.