On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 5:00:42 AM UTC, Brent wrote: > > > > On 4/23/2018 6:00 PM, [email protected] <javascript:> wrote: > > * First Principles, the tensor product can be used to describe the > composite system. It's virtually impossible to find an explanation from > First Principles. AG* > > > It's because the two systems are assumed independent, so every combination > of variable values, one system A and one from system B and occur...which it > the definition of a tensor product. > > Brent >
When you create a singlet pair, how do you know the subsystems are *independent*, which, according to what you claim, is the basis for writing the tensor product in the wf for the singlet system? Also, the tensor product is a bit more complicated. Every Ket is looking for a Bra, and we're dealing with a bi-linear mapping to the reals, from the inner product expanded as a Bra-Ket. Those Bra's, not explicitly included in the way the wf is usually written, are members of the dual space, dual to vector space of the Kets. It's complicated and I have to review some of the mathematics here, and hopefully, some day, to see how it relates to the singlet state wf. For something as important as non locality, I think we are obliged to do the detailed analysis. AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
