On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 3:30:44 PM UTC, [email protected] wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 3:03:21 PM UTC, Lawrence Crowell wrote: >> >> On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 6:54:15 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote: >>> >>> >>> Why try worrying these things out for yourself? The easiest thing is to >>> go and look up a text book. >>> >>> Bruce >>> >> >> I second this proposition. AG keeps asking nests of questions, when some >> serious amount of time reading a fairly standard quantum textbook would >> clear things up. >> >> LC >> > > You really don't get it. If Merzbacher is typical, there is no explanation > from First Principles. Do you know what that means? Next time I suppose you > will have me drinking Hemlock. AG >
*You're a conventional thinker. The UFO discussion proved this. Nests of questions? Partly thinking out loud; partly substantive. Can you tell the difference? Why is it assumed that the singlet state has a definite total spin AM? Bruce specifically referenced a case where that type of assumption is part of a classical result with no non locality in evidence; classical elastic collisions of billiard balls. No uncertainty in momentum. Is it legitimate to assume zero uncertainty in spin AM in singlet case when the treatment is supposed to be quantum mechanical? Can a genius like you provide a coherent answer, or should I drink the Hemlock? AG* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
