On Wednesday, April 25, 2018 at 9:48:44 PM UTC, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/25/2018 12:09 PM, [email protected] <javascript:> wrote: 
> > Did you not read Bruce's example of a entanglement which didn't imply 
> > non locality? It was classical elastic scattering where there was no 
> > uncertainty in momentum. How is this different from the singlet case 
> > with no uncertainty in momentum, yet we have non locality? AG 
>
> It's different because in the singlet case the individual particles do 
> not have any well defined spin direction before measurement.  So the 
> measurement of one makes the whole wave function change, aka "collapse", 
> even at the other distant measurement. 
>
> Brent 
>

Right. I thought that might make a difference BTW, the link you gave me on 
tensors
is real good, goes into details unlike other treatments I have seen, and 
part of a course
with many chapters.  AG

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to