On Thursday, April 26, 2018 at 5:39:34 PM UTC, John Clark wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 7:55 PM, <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote > >> *> when you factor into consideration that non locality persists in the >> many worlds postulated -- assuming you accept Bruce's analysis -- what >> exactly has been gained by asserting the MWI?* > > What has been gained is that in the MWI you don’t have to explain exactly > what a observation is >
Aren't observations made in the MWI? Must be a new version you just invented. Also, as I have repeatedly stated, no need to bring in consciousness to QM. How many times must I remind you that Feynman explained that very clearly. AG > or how consciousness works because they have nothing to due with it. We > assume the fundamental laws of physics are the same for matter that is > conscious and matter that is not, the Schrodinger wave equation says > nothing about it collapsing when a “measurement is observed” (whatever that > means), it was just stuck in there by the Copenhagen people. > >> > *The MWI has no testable consequences* > > That is not true. You demanded I provide such a test before and I did so > on a post to this list on December 14 2017. At the time your only comment > was "Never heard this before". > Please repeat it. AG > *> Even one copy of an observer with same history as "original" observer >> is too much for me.* > > That could be but the universe doesn’t care if you like it or not. > It's a question of ornate or not, or in good taste or not. Boils down maybe to Occam's Razor. AG > John K Clark > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
