On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 8:53:38 AM UTC, scerir wrote:
>
>
> Il 1 maggio 2018 alle 9.40 [email protected] <javascript:> ha scritto: 
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 6:57:14 AM UTC, scerir wrote:
>
> *AG: 'I suppose people will appeal to entanglement and decoherence to try 
> to make sense of how a measurement occurs. Nevertheless,  I tend strongly 
> to the view that the theory is inherently irreversible; that is, TIME 
> IRREVERSIBLE IN PRINCIPLE  If so, it implies the arrow of time has its 
> origin at the quantum level.'* 
>
> #### Maybe. 
>
> But ... since we say that there is non-separability between 
> (position/momentum or time/energy) entangled quantum states, can we also 
> say there is quantum non-separability not just *in space* (i.e. correlation 
> between space-like separated events) but also *in time* (there is no 
> *causal* ordering)? 
>
> Are there Bell's inequalities for correlations *in time*?  s.
>
> https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.06884
>
> https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.00248
>
>
> *If two events are space-like separated, I think it's correct to say there 
> is no causal ordering. However, when analyzing time reversal for 
> measurements -- whether or not it exists in QM -- aren't we dealing with 
> time-like ordering in the laboratory wherein the "first" measurement 
> occurred? AG*
>
> Frankly I do not think there is a "first" measurement and a "second" 
> measurement, in case of entangled space-like separated parties.
>

*Right. But isn't there a measurement, and THEN its hypothetical reversal; 
that is, the attempt to reconstruct its wf by going backward in time? How 
does space-like separated get into the act? AG*
 

> As Lucretius wrote (De Rerum Natura): "Incerto tempore, incertisque loci".
>
> I am inclined to think there is a law of nature (a statistical law of 
> nature) regulating the behaviour of entangled parties.
>
> But I also know that the speed of quantum information (the speed of 
> quantum influences between entangled parties) could be (in principle!!!) >> 
> c.
>
> Following set of links is, more or less, complete.
>
> https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0007008
>
> https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0212078
>
> https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0410025
>
> https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.3316
>
> https://arxiv.org/abs/0903.1076
>
> https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.3795
>
> https://arxiv.org/abs/1210.7308
>
> -serafino
>
> Greenberger: ”Quantum mechanics is magic! It is not black magic, but it i 
> s nonetheless magic!”
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to