On Tuesday, November 27, 2018 at 2:05:04 PM UTC-6, [email protected] 
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, November 27, 2018 at 6:49:51 PM UTC, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, November 27, 2018 at 12:17:08 PM UTC-6, [email protected] 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, November 27, 2018 at 6:00:50 PM UTC, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, November 27, 2018 at 8:43:35 AM UTC-6, [email protected] 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, November 27, 2018 at 9:27:46 AM UTC, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Monday, November 26, 2018 at 3:43:14 PM UTC-6, [email protected] 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *I checked the postulates in Feynman's Sums Over Histories (in link 
>>>>>>> provided by Phil) and I see nothing related to waves, as expected, and 
>>>>>>> thus 
>>>>>>> nothing about collapse of anything. I would suppose the same applies to 
>>>>>>> Heisenberg's Matrix Mechanics; no waves, no collapse. I suppose you 
>>>>>>> could 
>>>>>>> say they just produce correct probabilities, and imply nothing about 
>>>>>>> relative states other than their probabilities (which wave mechanics 
>>>>>>> does), 
>>>>>>> but certainly nothing about consciousness. To summarize: you're right 
>>>>>>> that 
>>>>>>> they are "no collapse" theories, but IMO they say nothing about 
>>>>>>> consciousness. AG*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In terms of the path-integral (PI) interpretation [ interesting 
>>>>>> lecture: 
>>>>>> https://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/videos/path-integral-interpretation-quantum-mechanics
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> ], there is in effect no waves or wave function, just paths, or 
>>>>>> histories, 
>>>>>> in the sum-over-histories (SOH) terminology.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is still "decoherence" in the SOH (a single history is 
>>>>>> ultimately "realized"), but it could be called "selection": a single 
>>>>>> history is selected from the total ensemble of multiple and interfering 
>>>>>> histories. E.g. a single point on a screen is "hit" by a photon in the 
>>>>>> double-slit experiment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Does "selection" add any insight to the measurement problem; that is, 
>>>>> why do we get what we get? And if not, what is its value? TIA, AG *
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> If you look at it as a "selection of the fittest" (one history 
>>>> surviving from an ensemble of histories), then it's like a form of quantum 
>>>> Darwinism. The quantum substrate is a cruel world where all histories (but 
>>>> one) die.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's not an explanation; rather, a vacuous statement of the result. AG 
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> But that is a criticism of Darwinism (*natural selection*) in general.
>>
>
> *Ridiculous comparison IMO. Darwinism posits a changing environment and 
> competition among species for niches. Nothing comparable in Quantum 
> Darwinism other than all outcomes fail except for one which succeeds in 
> each single trial, which we knew from the get-go. AG*
>
>>
>> *Quantum Darwinism* is a theory claiming to explain the emergence of the 
>> classical 
>> world <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_physics>from the quantum 
>> world <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics> as due to *a 
>> process of **Darwinian 
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin> natural selection 
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_selection>*; where the many 
>> possible quantum states <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_states> are 
>> selected against in favor of a stable pointer state 
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointer_state>.
>> [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Darwinism ]
>>
>> - pt
>>  
>>
>


As for "competition for niches", the histories are in a sense competing. 
Perhaps there is some conservation principle at work, so only one history 
can win. 

I don't know. Physicists don't know. We're even. :)

- pt

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to