It doesn't mention breakthroughs likely needed in quantum materials, as I 
mentioned.

- pt

On Friday, January 11, 2019 at 1:52:32 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
> Didn't you read the rebuttal to Dyahonov?
>
> Brent
>
> On 1/11/2019 2:23 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
> “This scheme, like all other schemes for quantum computation, relies on 
> speculative technology, does not in its current form take into account all 
> possible sources of noise, unreliability and manufacturing error, and 
> probably will not work.”
>
> Maybe they are right - quantum chips will only ultimately only be useful 
> in generating random numbers - but the above does sound like "fuel-powered 
> machines will never fly" in the 1800s.
>
> - pt
>
>
> On Thursday, January 10, 2019 at 5:45:47 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: 
>>
>> Interesting articles. 
>>
>> Brent 
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message -------- 
>>
>> Another rebuttal: 
>>
>> https://www.hpcwire.com/2019/01/09/the-case-against-the-case-against-quantum-computing/
>>  
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 1:57 PM : 
>> > In the IEEE Spectrum last week, Mikhail Dyakonov presented his overview 
>> of the field: 
>> > 
>> > 
>> https://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/the-case-against-quantum-computing
>>  
>>
>> -- 
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to