On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 2:56:19 PM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 2:03 PM Philip Thrift <cloud...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
> >> Experiments involve space and time, if those equations involve neither 
>>> I don't see how you could ever test them to see if they're correct;  and if 
>>> you can't do that then it's not science, it's just philosophy. And 
>>> philosophers have been proven wrong far more often than proven right.
>> *> What we call space (x,y,z) is just what we measure with a ruler.*
>> *What we call time t is just what we measure with a clock.*
> True, and thus space and time have well defined definitions. And that's 
> why we can't do experiments without a ruler and a clock, you wouldn't know 
> where to look for the results or when to look. Without experiment or 
> prediction or even postdiction you're just navel gazing not doing physics.
> John K Clark
I don't understand space and time have well defined definitions. If (say) 
LQG is right, then all there are are quantum particles and spinfoam cells 
(QPs+SCs=QPSCs) - that's all the stuff there is (spacetime itself is now 
stuff to), then all rulers and clocks are are things made of QPSCs.

- pt

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to