> On 5 May 2019, at 22:24, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the interesting reply. 

You are welcome.



> This is the piece my friend was thinking of:
> 
> https://www.mit.edu/people/dpolicar/writing/prose/text/epistemologicalNightmare.html
>  
> <https://www.mit.edu/people/dpolicar/writing/prose/text/epistemologicalNightmare.html>


OK. Nice. I forgot that little piece of chef-d’oeuvre, which is indeed in the 
book "MIND’S I” edited by Dennett and Hofstadter. The closest book to the 
correct consequence of Mechanism. I would add pieces of Daniel Galouye’s book 
Simulacron III in a next possible edition. 

All books by Smullyan are good introduction to what I call the “theology of the 
machine”, mainly the theory G*, or qG*, or qG1* and their mandatory intensional 
variants. The most explicit one is “Forever Undecided” where the Gödel diagonal 
lemma, or Kleene’s second recursion theorem is “modelled” by a human visiting 
the island of night and knaves. 

Bruno


> 
> Brent
> 
> On 5/5/2019 9:59 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> On 2 May 2019, at 22:59, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> You probably know book my friend [Max] is seeking.
>>> 
>>> Brent
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> "I recall encountering in one of Raymond Smullyan’s books a thought
>>> experiment that convinced me that it is possible to be mistaken about what
>>> one believes. That is, one can say “I believe X” and be speaking falsely
>>> even though one is not intentionally lying. Does anyone know what thought
>>> experiment I’m dimly recalling, and which of his books it appears in?"
>> One simple example, which plays a crucially important role in Mechanist 
>> Philosophy, since Plato (at least), appears in one of the last book by 
>> Raymond Smullyan:
>> https://www.amazon.com/Gödelian-Puzzle-Book-Puzzles-Paradoxes/dp/0486497054
>> 
>> “Do you have rational evidence that you are now awake? Isn’t it logically 
>> possible that you are now asleep and dreaming all this? Well, I once got 
>> into an argument with a philosopher about this. He tried to convince me that 
>> I had no rational evidence to justify believing that I was now awake. I 
>> insisted that I was perfectly justified in being certain that I was awake. 
>> We argued long and tenaciously, and I finally won the argument, and he 
>> conceded that I did have rational evidence that I was awake. At that point I 
>> woke up.”
>> 
>> Of course, that is, in a nutshell, the dream argument.
>> 
>> With “belief" = “have rational evidence for”, below we have a generator of 
>> situation with "I believe X”, genuinely believed and wrong. (In fact, all 
>> consistent theories + the axiom that they are inconsistent).
>> 
>> In his book “Forever Undecided” Smullyan explains Gödel’s theorem, in the 
>> frame of the Knight and Knaves island, leading his “reasoner of type 4”, 
>> whose beliefs includes
>> 
>> [](A -> B) -> ([]A -> []B)
>> []A -> [][]A
>> 
>> And are close to the modus ponies rule (from a proof of A and a proof of A 
>> -> B, derive B) and the necessitation rule (from a proof of A derive []A).
>> 
>> When such a reasoner met, on the knight-knave island, a guy telling him, you 
>> will never believe that I am a knight, will obey to the “theology” G*, in 
>> particular, Gödel’s and Löb’s theorems apply to him, and it will be 
>> consistent that he has false beliefs.
>> 
>> I am not sure I remember more specific examples.
>> 
>> Bruno
>> 
>> PS I hope you don’t mind I sent this to the everything list, as both type 4 
>> reasoners, rational belief, but also the dream argument plays a big role in 
>> Mechanism. I changed the name.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/FB1B1EF0-2F11-4025-8F97-891408680037%40ulb.ac.be.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to