Russell Standish
> Of course this means an eternal return. But it is nothing to fear - you will not experience your life over again Ok, but if my life is a nightmare (for example) then, there is something to worry about. Lawrence Crowell > To make things a bit more bizarre, if space is flat and infinite R^3 then there will be regions out there with duplicates of you. Even if it is fact of our reality I don't feel the pain, when duplicate of me, has a wounded finger. She is not me, and duplicate of me in future, will not be me either. Do you agree? By the way, if I understand you correctly, you equate time and space, so probably you have different views on these issues than Dr. Peter Rowlands - he claims that time is radically different from space, absolutely continuous and irreversible. I'm not suggesting that this view is better than yours - I'm just saying :) Brent > It would the same the unique "return" by the identity of indiscernibles. This principle is not so obvious for everybody - for example on this article: https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2015/02/concepts_of_sameness_part_4.html mathematician Dr. John Baez presents some objections regarding identity of indiscernibles. Spudb > Yeah, Frank Tipler proposed this more seriously, and Sabine Hossenfelder, more recently., speculatively, via quantum mechanics. Great :) I can't find it. Could you put a link please? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/dee28698-2022-4a4b-8b29-efa76dbd1742%40googlegroups.com.
