On Wed, Sep 11, 2019, at 00:18, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List wrote:
>
>
> On 9/10/2019 4:30 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> > Another argument that has been given here before is that if quantum
> > immortality is true, then we should expect to see a number of people
> > who are considerably older than the normal life expectancy -- and we
> > do not see people who are two or three hundred years old. Even if the
> > probabilities are very low, there have been an awful lot of people
> > born within the last 500 or so years -- some must have survived on our
> > branch if this scenario is true.
>
> My argument was that each of us should find ourselves to be much older
> than even the oldest people we know.
That is my argument against the existence of heaven and hell. If they existed,
we would already be there -- oh wait :)
However, here it only applies if the tree is infinitely deep but not infinitely
wide.
Telmo.
> Brent
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/7ec88255-a555-7f57-eb80-a31c2a559a3d%40verizon.net.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/9e0adf5c-ad03-42c2-aaf0-91d18d37169b%40www.fastmail.com.
