On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 9:10 PM John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:07 PM Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> *> Our decision are classical, so (even in the Everett quantum world)
>> they do not "create new worlds”. I suspect Sean Carroll is quoted out of
>> context, as indeed that is a mistake (a common one).*
>
>
> If there is one theme running through Sean Carroll's new book it's that
> nothing is classical and everything is  Quantum Mechanical, and the
> deterministic wavefunction of the Multiverse can be thought of as a
> wavefunction of wavefunctions not of worlds because even the concept of a
> world is just a human approximation. He suggests our current difficulties
> in finding a theory that goes beyond General Relativity is that we're
> trying to find something to stick onto it to make it Quantum Mechanical but
> nature didn't start classical, it was Quantum Mechanical from day one, if
> there was a day one and there may not have been.
>


Has Carroll forgotten about effective theories? Even QFT is just an
"effective theory". We use classical approximations to quantum mechanics
because they work -- not for ideological or philosophical reasons.

Bruce

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLTzmRFCT--0ShER042tLQm__FzEo6EbLWAOLMwa9MqCbA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to