> On 21 Sep 2019, at 19:27, Philip Thrift <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> A Logic of Direct Evidence
> Sungwoo Park
> 
> https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9f61/84a9492deb75d64209f1368d7860f851c1bd.pdf
> 
> "This paper presents a system of modal logic that is capable of expressing 
> the notion of normal proof within the system itself. That is, the system has 
> a means for both recognizing and manipulating its own normal proofs, thereby 
> making normal proofs an inherent property of the logic. As an application, we 
> present an authorization logic whose unique feature is to distinguish between 
> “what a principal would affirm via inference” and “what a principal 
> explicitly says.”


Very good paper. It is close to the machine’s the logic of []p & p, S4Grz (with 
the triangle as modality) but also to X1*. 

But with mechanism, we cannot chose the axioms in the phenomenology of mind, 
nor in the phenomenology of matter, as we have to derive it from G and G*. Note 
that the author mention the similarity with the provability logics.

Bruno



> 
> @philipthrift
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a8e4eed6-1b0c-4df8-aae1-c01c75aa2228%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a8e4eed6-1b0c-4df8-aae1-c01c75aa2228%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/D72AE691-59BA-4817-A3FA-D13E0E3A6747%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to