On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:30 AM Philip Thrift <[email protected]> wrote:
> *What specifically in the book makes Many Worlds compelling vs. the > one-world alternatives? And if there is nothing in the Many Worlds approach > that is really better than a one-world approach, why multiply worlds beyond > necessity? And where does all the extra matter come from to keep branching > off new worlds again and again?* > *Read the goddamn book and find out!* John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0NAbxJgTpJaR_S%2BSAw3EeAfm94sSYeo442aMz%3DwWRF7A%40mail.gmail.com.
