On Wednesday, October 2, 2019 at 4:52:50 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 1, 2019 at 5:59:42 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:40 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Sunday, September 29, 2019 at 8:53:35 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote: >>>> >>>> Bruce considers that inflation remains somewhat speculative; that it's >>>> a solution looking for a problem to solve. So my questions are as follows: >>>> 1), does inflation solve the homogeneity problem; namely, that the >>>> observable universe seems to have come to thermo equlibrium, manifested by >>>> homogeneity, even though it is causally UN-connected; and 2), does it >>>> explain the absence of magnetic monopoles? TIA, AG >>>> >>> >>> Bruce; it seems like a simple issue you can resolve. That is, if you're >>> skeptical that inflation solves any problems, does that include its allege >>> explanation for large scale homogeneity and the absence of magnetic >>> monopoles? TIA, AG >>> >> >> Alan, stop treating me as though I existed merely to answer your >> questions. The answers to these questions are readily available in the >> literature. It is clear from your postings here that you are not widely >> read in the modern literature on these subjects. I am not your teacher. I >> think Sabine Hossenfelder has a blog post on this: >> >> http://backreaction.blogspot.com/search?q=+inflation >> >> Bruce >> > > Alan also asks same questions over and over, where Alan then shaves these > down to absurd points in refinements. These things are in internet > resources that are fairly accessible to laymen. > > LC >
Lawrence; I'm wondering. Seriously; are now firmly enscounced in your Alzheimer's phase? This is the first, or at most second time I've raised the issue of whether inflation solves the homegeneity issue of our visible universe. And instead of addressing the issue, which Bruce glibly dismisses, you absurdly accuse of me of "absurd points of refinements". Seriously, what bullshit! Is that how you characterize the progressively detailed measurements of, say, the CMBR. Are more and more detailed physical observations of whatever, also "absure points of refinements"? On the homogeneity issue, I HAVE thought about this a lot, and I have used the internet in an effort to get some resolution, and reach some conclusions. What your comment shows is that bringing it up here is nothing more than fertile ground for insults from wannabe thinkers. AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/dabe0e97-a613-4c27-8826-e5daad86f274%40googlegroups.com.
