On Tuesday, October 8, 2019 at 4:03:12 AM UTC-5, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > May 2017 lecture notes: > http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/lecture_notes/qua17_05_02.pdf > > by Jan Swart [ http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/ ] > > from http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/tea_index.html > > Lectures on quantum probability (notes) > > > *Quantum Probability Theory* > > > In the summer semester 2017 I have taught Quantum Probability Theory > (NMTP578) at the Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics > <http://www.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~kpms/>, MFF, Charles University. Here are > the lecture notes > <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/lecture_notes/qua17_05_25.pdf> (final > version). (Here are the first > <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/dict13_6.pdf>, second > <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/lecture_notes/qua17_03_14.pdf>, third > <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/lecture_notes/qua17_03_27.pdf>, fourth > <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/lecture_notes/qua17_04_05.pdf>, fifth > <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/lecture_notes/qua17_04_18.pdf>, sixth > <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/lecture_notes/qua17_04_25.pdf>, and > seventh <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/lecture_notes/qua17_05_02.pdf> > versions > of the lecture notes.) > > > Here are the exams of June 30th > <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/lecture_notes/quatentamen17a.pdf>, July > 4th <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/lecture_notes/quatentamen17b.pdf>, > and September 5th > <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/lecture_notes/quatentamen17c.pdf>, with > answers. Time for these exams was 3 hours. Exercises 2 (d) and 3 (d) of the > exam of Sept. 5 are quite hard; in particular, a complete solution to Ex. 2 > (d) cannot be expected within the time frame of the exam. > > > Here are the Lecture notes from 2013 > <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/dict13_6.pdf>. Here are the Lecture notes > from 2010 <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/dict10.pdf>. Here are the Lecture > notes from 2007 <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/dict07.pdf>. Here is a > Summary > of Chapter 5 <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/overview_chap5.pdf>. Here > are the Exam of June 20, 2013, with solutions > <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/tentamen13.pdf>, Exam of June 25, 2008 > <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/tentamen08a.pdf>, Exam of September 18, > 2008, with solutions <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/tentamen08b.pdf>, Exam > of September 30, 2008, with solutions > <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/tentamen08c.pdf>. Here is the Exam of > June 22, 2007, with solutions <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/czten.pdf>. > Here are Lecture notes from 2004 <http://staff.utia.cas.cz/swart/elqua.ps> > from > a similar course taught at Erlangen University. > > > > @philipthrift >
(pg. 35) The interpretation of quantum mechanics is notoriously difficult, and the interpretation we have just given is not undisputed. There is an extensive literature on the subject in which innumerably many different interpretations have been suggested, with the result that almost everything one can say on this subject has at some point been fiercely denied by someone. ... To add to the confusion, it is tradition to call the probability law ρ a ‘mixed state’, even though it is conceptually something very different from the states ω of classical probability. @philipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/38590ce5-381c-4315-afa0-cd3d50b13b66%40googlegroups.com.
