Philip Thrift <[email protected]> wrote:

*>Have you suddenly become a fan of hidden variables models? In that case,
> I am totally on your side.*


If you're a fan of hidden variables then, to be consistent with
experimental results, you must also be a fan of non-locality, or
non-reality, or superdeterminism.

*> QM (or the Schrodinger Equation, SE) is incomplete because it does not
> solve the measurement problem, *


Many Worlds solves the measurement problem because, unlike every other
interpretation, it precisely defines what a measurement is, it's just a
change, any sort of change. So what you really have is not a measurement
problem but a many worlds problem, and it's only a problem for emotional
reasons not scientific reasons, some people are just repelled by the idea
that there is more than one version of themselves around; but the universe
is not required to be in harmony with individual human desires.

*> so there must be a new nonlinear SE, *


And all those proposed wheels within wheels added to the Schrodinger
Equation and the massive load of additional mathematical complexity that
entails does not improve the modified equation's ability to predict
experimental results one iota, it gets rid of many worlds and does
absolutely nothing else. It reminds me of a fundamentalist preacher's
theory that the world was made in 4004 BC and God put dinosaur bones in the
ground at that time that look much older but are not, and God can do that
because God can do anything. Making quantum calculations is difficult
enough as it is, we should be looking for ways to make it easier not
harder.

And by the way, all those modifications of the Schrodinger Equation involve
sticking in random factors, Many Worlds has no need of such random factors,
it's contend with the simpler deterministic Schrodinger Equation just as it
is now.

John K Clark

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv3wd_eTGe%3DM7q30f-UdggB%2Bt5gDZPZdzpLYd9-rQCc0sw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to