On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 5:33:53 PM UTC-5, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
> What is a path integral? It is an accounting of all amplitudes or paths
> from the state |i> to |f> at t = 0 and t = T respectively. The amplitude
> for this is <f|i>, and to compute the paths we consider the completeness
> sums 1 = ∫|q(t)><q(t)| over configuration space and a product of them as
>
> <f|i> = <f| ∫|q(δt)><q(δt)| ∫|q(2δt)><q(2δt)| … ∫|q(t + δt)><q(t + δt)| …
> ∫|q(T - δt)><q(T - δt)|i>
>
> which we write in the more compact formatting for the initial and final
> states configuration variables, or eigenstates of the position operator
>
> <f|i> = <f| Π_{n=1}^N ∫|q(nδt)><q(nδt)| |i> =
> Π_{n=1}^N∫<q(nδt)|q((n+1)δt)>
>
> Now in the terms <q(nδt)|q((n+1)δt)> I insert the momentum completeness
> sum *1* = ∫|p(nδt)><p(nδt)| so that
>
> <q(nδt)|q((n+1)δt)> = <q(nδt)|*1*|q((n+1)δt)> =
> <q(nδt)|p(nδt)><p(nδt)|q((n+1)δt)>.
>
> Fourier theory tells us <q(nδt)|p(nδt)> = (1/2π)e^{ip(dq/dt)δt}and that
>
> <q(nδt)|p(nδt)><p(nδt)|q((n+1)δt)> = (1/2π)e^{ip(dq/dt) - iHδt}
>
> where the Hδt is from the time translation of q. This is then
>
> <f|i> = ∫d[δq]Π_{n=1}^N (1/2π)e^{ip(dq/dt) – Hδt} = (1/2π)∫D[q]e^{∫(ipdq -
> iHdt)
>
> or Z = (1/2π)∫D[q]e^{iS}, where the upper case D just represents an
> integration from a product of integrations. The action comes from the
> Lagrangian L = pdq/dt - H and S = ∫Ldt.
>
> That's all folks! There is nothing mysterious about path integrals! There
> is nothing that makes them contrary to any quantum interpretation or that
> makes them render a proof of one. The ideology of Dowker and others amount
> to an auxiliary axiom or physical postulate that is in addition to be basic
> idea of a path integral. There is nothing I did above that is not straight
> up plain vanilla quantum mechanics. Things get a little more funny with
> QFT, but there is nothing outside of QFT in the nature of a path integral.
>
> LC
>
Though the above may be correct mathematically, *this is a misleading and
incomplete presentation of the path integral*.
Nowhere above are probabilities referred to!
On the other hand, see
http://muchomas.lassp.cornell.edu/8.04/Lecs/lec_FeynmanDiagrams/node3.html
http://www.johnboccio.com/research/quantum/notes/Feynman-Prob.pdf
etc.
@philipthrift
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a365840d-2227-4f53-b375-624d698df329%40googlegroups.com.
