Maybe someday quantum computers will "work". But Nature by itself works
perhaps with *sloppy quantum computing*, and there is no reason to expect
QC machines will ever match QC un-sloppy math.
Sloppy quantum programming may be a thing that is useful someday.
@philipthrift
On Thursday, October 17, 2019 at 1:38:34 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
>
> If the article is accurate and there is no rapid fix, then all the
> purported thousands of D-Wave entanglements result in only a few actual
> successful computer operations.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philip Thrift <[email protected] <javascript:>>
> To: Everything List <[email protected] <javascript:>>
> Sent: Thu, Oct 17, 2019 5:07 am
> Subject: Welcome to the world of NISQ programming
>
>
>
>
> http://nautil.us/blog/physicists-say-googles-quantum-computer-is-still-far-from-practical
>
>
> Bottom line it seems: There may be quantum computers, but expect lots of
> errors.
>
> So can NISQ (“noisy intermediate-scale quantum") programming ever be made
> useful?
>
> @philipthrift
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/45e2600f-63f2-4b91-8402-1ed20ecfbbbd%40googlegroups.com.
