On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 4:17:28 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/3/2019 10:43 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
> In order for this statement to be useful, we need to solve the preferred 
> basis problem. For example, consider the mathematical identity
>
> |u a w> + |e d c> = |n+ s+ f+> + |n+ s- f-> + |n- s+ f-> + |n- s- f+> (2)
>
> where
>
> |n+> = |u> + |e>, |n-> = |u> - |e>
> |s+> = |a> + |d>, |s-> = |a> - |d>,
> |f+> = |w> + |c>, |f-> = |w> - |c>.
>
> Unless we introduce a further piece of interpretive apparatus, we are in 
> danger of supposing that the system described by |phi> is also described by 
> |n+ s+ f+> or each of the other components in (2), which would mean we have 
> not solved the original problem. However, this is easily solved, as follows:
> Postulate 1. A quantum system and environment described by the state |phi> 
> is also described by one of the states of the basis in which the reduced 
> density matrix of |phi> is diagonal after the environment has been traced 
> over.
> The `collapse' from |phi> to one of |u a w> and |e d c> is now no 
> different from the abrupt change in a classical probability distribution 
> when more information becomes available.
>
>
> At this point one is then tempted to ask why not just say the wf 
> collapsed?  Tracing over the environment is already something the 
> experimenter does on paper.  It's not part of the Schroedinger equation 
> unitary evolution.  Sure it makes the off-diagonal terms small...but it 
> doesn't make them zero.  It's still just FAPP.
>
>
> Brent
>

In effect at this point it is much the same as with decoherence where a 
density matrix is reduced to diagaonals and it is a classical probability 
"collapse."

LC 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4b05b819-2c7e-4890-aa3a-117b683d46d1%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to