On Wednesday, November 6, 2019 at 3:19:58 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 5 Nov 2019, at 02:53, Alan Grayson <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > IIUC, as the temperature rises, interference in the double slit C60 > experiment declines, and eventually disappears. I don't think this is > really a which-way experiment because the interference disappears whether > or not which-way is observed. How does this effect the collapse issue? > Usually, IIUC, when interference ceases to exist, it implies collapse of > the wf. So, is the C60 double slit experiment evidence for collapse of the > wf? TIA, AG > > > My two pre views posts explained exactly this, in the non-collapse frame. > It works for particles, Molecules and even macroscopic cats. The advantage > of the non-collapse quantum theory is that any interaction can be counted > as a measurement. So heat cannot not decrease interference, for the > technical factorisation reason already explained. > > Bruno > > > > They've sent 2000-atom sized molecules through double slits.
What about sending cats? @philipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/08edded8-362f-4ae0-bca6-8716ea7736fd%40googlegroups.com.
