On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 10:27 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:
*> I notice you habitually avoid discussing the problem of ontological > versus epistemological * It is a ontological fact that Bell's inequality is violated and there is no epistemological explanation for that fact. You keep wanting a mental picture of the quantum world that conforms with your common sense everyday expectations of how things should work, I'd like that too but our wish will never be granted. I like Many Worlds because although it's very bizarre it's the least bizarre quantum interpretation that fits the hyper bizarre facts; but the universe doesn't care what I think is strange so if it turns out Many Worlds is not true then we would know that something even stranger is. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv1Gb5Mz3mo3KDrP4XeCcUYmOKH%3DrcpVHb-i%2B5fD0xj4cw%40mail.gmail.com.
