On Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 3:08:02 AM UTC-6, scerir wrote:
>
>
> True about Schrödinger, but there are *one world* formulations in which 
> there is *no wave function collapse,* or *no wave function* at all to 
> begin with. 
>
> @philipthrift 
>
> “The idea that they [measurement outcomes] be not alternatives but all 
> really happen simultaneously seems lunatic to him [the quantum theorist], 
> just impossible. He thinks that if the laws of nature took this form for, 
> let me say, a quarter of an hour, we should find our surroundings rapidly 
> turning into a quagmire, or sort of a featureless jelly or plasma, all 
> contours becoming blurred, we ourselves probably becoming jelly fish. It is 
> strange that he should believe this. For I understand he grants that 
> unobserved nature does behave this way – namely according to the wave 
> equation. The aforesaid alternatives come into play only when we make an 
> observation - which need, of course, not be a scientific observation. Still 
> it would seem that, according to the quantum theorist, nature is prevented 
> from rapid jellification only by our perceiving or observing it. [........] 
> The compulsion to replace the simultaneous happenings, as indicated 
> directly by the theory, by alternatives, of which the theory is supposed to 
> indicate the respective probabilities, arises from the conviction that what 
> we really observe are particles - that actual events always concern 
> particles, not waves."
> -Erwin Schroedinger, The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Dublin 
> Seminars (1949-1955) and Other Unpublished Essays (Ox Bow Press, 
> Woodbridge, Connecticut, 1995), pages 19-20.
>



Yes, I should add:

True about Schrödinger, but there are *one world* formulations in which 
there is *no wave function collapse,* or *no wave function* -- and *no 
observers *-- at all to begin with.


@philipthrift 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3628a2fc-82e4-4db7-8ee1-61f88a880946%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to