The interpretation of a superposition as representing a system that can be in one or the other state, is incompatible with interference experiments.
*Please, if you can, elaborate why this is the case? AG* And physicist don't care much about interpretation and the language used to communicate what certain concepts mean. So, many physicists may say that a particle in a superposition between being in position x and y is at x and y simultaneously, even though they know that's not really what a superposition means (obviously there is only one particle not 2). What matters is the mathematical formulation of the theory, not the words used to describe this. Saibal -- Sent from: http://everything-list.105.n7.nabble.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1575258123327-0.post%40n7.nabble.com.
