On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 8:00 AM Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

*>>Yesterday before the duplication when there was only ONE, which ONE of
>> the ONE ended up seeing what ONE of them is seeing NOW?*
>
>
> *> We are in the semi-duplication context, *
>

Semi-duplication? You are assuming there is something non-material that the
Matter Duplicating Machine can not duplicate (aka the soul), you're
assuming the very thing you're trying to prove.


>
> *> so your question is badly formulated or ambiguous.*
>

Yes Captain Obvious, the question is badly formulated and ambiguous. But
I'm not the one making the inability to answer the "question" the
foundation of his entire philosophy, you are.


> > *But things are very simple.*
>

Yes indeed things are very simple, but that word has 2 meanings, one is
uncomplicated but the other is stupid.


> *> Yesterday, a computationalist has put on the annihilation copy button.
> He predicted that he will feel to be in only once city, but that he was
> incapable of saying with certainty which one in particular.*
>

He can't give the answer not because he doesn't know it but because badly
formulated or ambiguous questions have no answer and are in fact not
questions at all, they are gibberish.

*> By definition of the correct first person prediction,*
>

There is no coherent consistent definition of *THE* correct first person if
First Person Duplication Machines are involved.


> *> That describes the protocol*
>

You have no "protocol", you have a self contradictory clown show.

> *the question of the prediction of the first person experience* [...]
>

And in your very next sentence you give an example of the clown show.
Protocol my ass.

John K Clark

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0psNrN5ONh0Xy8A2_in7EVGZ7iHckheOjKSqEYEsMXpg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to