On Friday, January 24, 2020 at 10:57:43 PM UTC-7, smitra wrote:
>
> What is the least speculative is the reheating caused by the 
> annihilation of electrons and positrons which something that we may be 
> able to measure in the future is we can measure the temperature of the 
> neutrino background. About one second after the Big Bang the neutrinos 
> had decoupled from the electrons and photons, which means that the 
> average time between interactions would be longer than the lifetime of 
> the universe, so thermal equilibrium would not be maintained. However, 
> the temperatures of the two sectors still evolved in the same way due to 
> adiabatic cooling until about 15 seconds after the Big Bang when 
> temperature became too low for electrons and positrons to be created. 
>
> So, after 15 seconds after the Big Bang due to adiabatic cooling, 
> positrons and electrons would start to vanish due to annihilation 
> without their numbers getting replenished. The energy released from the 
> net annihilation partially went into the internal energy of photons, as 
> part of it would have been expended in the work done due to the 
> adiabatic expansion. But the entropy of such a process is conserved, so 
> we can calculate the change in the temperature due to eliminating the 
> electrons and positions. The entropy per unit volume of a electron gas 
> in the extremely relativistic limit at zero chemical potential and 
> temperature T s given by: 
>
> S_e = 28 pi^5 c k^4/(45 h^3) T^3 
>
> This can be obtained from the Fermi-Dirac distribution, the chemical 
> potential is zero because we're considering an electron positron gas in 
> equilibrium with photons and photons have a chemical potential of zero. 
> The entropy density of a positron gas is, of course also equal to S_e. 
> The entropy density of a photon gas is: 
>
> S_f = 32 pi^5 c k^4/(45 h^3) T^3 
>
>
> Before the electrons and positrons annihilated, the entropy density of 
> the electron, positron, photon sector was: 
>
> S = S_f + 2 S_e 
>
> The neutrino sector has decoupled, but it will continue to have a 
> temperature that's equal to the temperature in the electron sector 
> provided the above formula for the entropy is valid. Once the electrons 
> have annihilated with the positrons, the temperature of the neutrino 
> sector will track the temperature of a hypothetical relativistic 
> electron positron gas in equilibrium with photons. The real temperature 
> of the photon sector will be lower, but the entropy density will be 
> exactly the same as that of the hypothetical electron, positron, photon 
> gas. The real temperature T is thus related to the hypothetical 
> temperature Th without annihilation, according to: 
>
> S_f(T) = S_f(Th) + 2 S_e(Th) 
>
> It then follows that: 
>
> Th = (4/11)^(1/3) T 
>
> The temperature of the neutrino sector will continue to track Th, so the 
> temperature of the cosmic background neutrinos today will be about 1.9 
> K. 
>
> Saibal 
>

Thanks a lot! This merits further study before any comment is warranted. AG 

>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 25-01-2020 05:59, Alan Grayson wrote: 
> > If the universe began as very hot, and given that the current 
> > temperature of the CMBR is very cool, 2.7 deg K, in what models is a 
> > re-heating phase postulated, and why? TIA, AG 
> > 
> >  -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > Groups "Everything List" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> > an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. 
> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> > 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/e30841c5-3969-41b7-bba6-a1387310dbf7%40googlegroups.com
>  
> > [1]. 
> > 
> > 
> > Links: 
> > ------ 
> > [1] 
> > 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/e30841c5-3969-41b7-bba6-a1387310dbf7%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
>  
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/52e66dbc-e32b-495d-b911-733827991ee9%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to