> On 11 Mar 2020, at 15:31, Lawrence Crowell <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 10:16:38 AM UTC-5, Philip Thrift wrote:
> 
> https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.05734 <https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.05734>
> 
> @philipthrift
> 
> It looks to be a version of the busy beaver problem. The scale of the problem 
> grows beyond computable bounds.

It concerns also infinite machine. With mechanism, they have a natural role in 
the phenomenology, but get problematic if we add them to the ontology.

Bruno



> 
> LC 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/78b7f972-953b-48a2-94b3-112693535723%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/78b7f972-953b-48a2-94b3-112693535723%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/E3CCA552-4558-4543-BD7C-B1F7B1A1030E%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to