On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 8:44 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:
> *There's a simple choice in this matter. Someone who denies that QM has > postulates from which the HUP is implied, either knows little or nothing > about QM, or won't acknowledge it due to dishonesty. AG * > Mr.Carl Sagan co-author, you can prove that one mathematical statement can be derived from another, but if they deal with physics then the only way to know if EITHER statement is even approximately true is to test them experimentally. And if the new physical statement can't be derived from the physical "postulates" but it nevertheless makes better predictions then it's time to find new improved physical "postulates". Oh and you forgot IHA. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv3hCsmx9w%3DDYavOAMVoYX1Fa76SAA3dLB9CtxRwaZe8Bg%40mail.gmail.com.
