Stephen Wolfram @stephen_wolfram
https://twitter.com/stephen_wolfram/status/1289381082165633026

*So exciting to see how quickly things are moving with #WolframPhysics...  
Makes me think of quantum mechanics circa 1925.  It's taken me 2 weeks just 
to summarize part of what got done at our Summer School ...*

tech ref: https://www.wolframphysics.org/technical-introduction/

https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2020/07/a-burst-of-physics-progress-at-the-2020-wolfram-summer-school/

[excerpt]
... 

The starting point for any discussion of quantum mechanics in our models is 
the notion of multiway systems, and the concept that there can be many 
possible paths of evolution, represented by a multiway graph. The nodes in 
the multiway graph represent quantum (eigen)states. Common ancestry among 
these states defines entanglements between them. The branchial graph then 
in effect gives a map of the entanglements of quantum states—and in the 
large-scale limit one can think of this as corresponding to a “branchial 
space” ...

The full picture of multiway systems for transformations between 
hypergraphs is quite complicated. But a key point that has become 
increasingly clear is that many of the core phenomena of quantum mechanics 
are actually quite generic to multiway systems, independent of the details 
of the underlying rules for transitions between states. And as a result, 
it’s possible to study quantum formalism just by looking at string 
substitution systems, without the full complexity of hypergraph 
transformations.

A quantum state corresponds to a collection of nodes in the multiway graph. 
Transitions between states through time can be studied by looking at the 
paths of bundles of geodesics through the multiway graph from the nodes of 
one state to another.

In traditional quantum formalism different states are assigned quantum 
amplitudes that are specified by complex numbers. One of our realizations 
has been that this “packaging” of amplitudes into complex numbers is quite 
misleading. In our models it’s much better to think about the magnitude and 
phase of the amplitude separately. The magnitude is obtained by looking at 
path weights associated with multiplicity of possible paths that reach a 
given state. The phase is associated with location in branchial space.

One of the most elegant results of our models so far is that geodesic paths 
in branchial space are deflected by the presence of relativistic energy 
density represented by the multiway causal graph—and therefore that the 
path integral of quantum mechanics is just the analog in branchial space of 
the Einstein equations in physical space.

To connect with the traditional formalism of quantum mechanics we must 
discuss how measurement works. The basic point is that to obtain a definite 
“measured result” we must somehow get something that no longer shows 
“quantum branches”. Assuming that our underlying system is causal 
invariant, this will eventually always “happen naturally”. But it’s also 
something that can be achieved by the way an observer (who is inevitably 
themselves embedded in the multiway system) samples the multiway graph. And 
as emphasized by Jonathan Gorard this is conveniently parametrized by 
thinking of the observer as effectively adding certain “completions” to the 
transition rules used to construct the multiway system.

It looks as if it’s then straightforward to understand things like the Born 
rule for quantum probabilities. (To project one state onto another involves 
a “rectangle” of transformations that have path weights corresponding to 
the product of those for the sides.) It also seems possible to understand 
things like destructive interference—essentially as the result of geodesics 
for different cases landing up at sufficiently distant points in branchial 
space that any “spanning completion” must pull in a large number of 
“randomly canceling” path weights.

... 

@philipthrift

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/63a030bc-fc5d-4fa0-98f7-95e174416025n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to