On Monday, August 3, 2020 at 12:15:23 PM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, August 3, 2020 at 8:55:17 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, August 2, 2020 at 5:00:22 PM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, August 2, 2020 at 1:55:15 PM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I looked at the precession question, wrote it in WORD and then posted 
>>>> it in the wrong thread. A big line of anti-virus defense is working 
>>>> off-line. I do a lot of work locally and pop on and off the internet. I 
>>>> try 
>>>> to never leave my machines on-line with an open port for anyone or any bot 
>>>> to enter to cause mischief.
>>>>
>>>> With this the question is odd. How something moves in free and flat 
>>>> space and spacetime is just determined by its initial conditions.
>>>>
>>>> LC
>>>>
>>>
>>> If one starts with SR and zero curvature of spacetime, and places a test 
>>> particle in that spacetime spatially at rest, how will spacetime tell 
>>> matter how to move if spacetime isn't curved? AG 
>>>
>>
>> I think in this situation the direction of motion is ambiguous. AG 
>>
>
> No. It doesn't spatially move, but it moves in space-time since the 
> observer's clock continues to advance. AG 
>

What bothers me about this is that the spatial coordinates generally depend 
on each other, and time. In this situation will the geodesic equations 
yield a solution where the spatial coordinates remain fixed? AG 

>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sunday, August 2, 2020 at 9:05:57 AM UTC-5 [email protected] 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday, August 2, 2020 at 5:30:36 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The periapsis or perihelion advance of Mercury is largely a result of 
>>>>>> classical perturbation theory in classical mechanics. About 10% of the 
>>>>>> perihelion advance could not be accounted for by perturbation methods in 
>>>>>> classical mechanics. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This has to be admired in some ways. Finding the ephemeris of Mercury 
>>>>>> is tough, for the planet makes brief appearances near the sun in 
>>>>>> mornings 
>>>>>> and evenings. Finding an orbital path from its course across the sky is 
>>>>>> not 
>>>>>> easy. The second issue is that perturbation methods in classical 
>>>>>> mechanics 
>>>>>> are difficult. These were developed arduously in the 19th century and Le 
>>>>>> Verrier worked on this to find the planet Neptune from the perturbed 
>>>>>> motion 
>>>>>> of Uranus in 1848. These methods were worked on through the 19th 
>>>>>> century. 
>>>>>> The later work of von Zeipel and Poincare were used to compute the 
>>>>>> periapsis advance of Mercury, but there was this persistent 
>>>>>> 43arc-sec/year 
>>>>>> that resisted these efforts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It was general relativity that predicted this anomaly in ways that 
>>>>>> are far simpler than the classical perturbation methods. This 
>>>>>> post-diction 
>>>>>> of GR was an initial success in the theory, followed up shortly by the 
>>>>>> Eddington expedition that found the optical effects of GR in a solar 
>>>>>> eclipse in 1919.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LC
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I appreciate your grasp of the history, but you haven't answered my 
>>>>> question and don't seem aware of what it is (plus you posted your reply 
>>>>> on 
>>>>> the wrong thread). AG 
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sunday, August 2, 2020 at 3:49:28 AM UTC-5 [email protected] 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Saturday, August 1, 2020 at 10:35:09 PM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In flat space, which is tantamount to assuming the absence of 
>>>>>>>> gravity, and non-zero curvature, a body placed at spatial coordinates 
>>>>>>>> x,y,z, will move because t increments. But if there is zero curvature, 
>>>>>>>> in 
>>>>>>>> which direction will it move? That is, how is the direction of motion 
>>>>>>>> determined? TIA, AG
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CORRECTION; above, I meant to write, " ... which is tantamount to 
>>>>>>> assuming the absence of gravity and ZERO curvature, ... "   AG
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1eb6b644-3bcc-444e-a61d-2bf7aabdd10fo%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to