On Saturday, October 10, 2020 at 1:03:00 PM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote: > > On Friday, October 9, 2020 at 12:27:00 PM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote: > >> >> >> On Friday, October 9, 2020 at 3:53:46 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote: >>> >>> I read this yesterday. It so far appears there is no data to support >>> information from a prior cosmic cycle. >>> >>> Penrose did ground breaking work on the nature of black holes and I >>> think his crowning achievement in mathematical physics is twistor theory of >>> the mid 70s. His CCC theory is a bit like Hoyle's steady state theory in >>> that it is a sort of intended obstruction to a more successful theory that >>> is gaining support. >>> >>> LC >>> >> >> *Please clarify your last sentence above. What "more successful theory" >> are you referring to; the hot BB with inflation? AG * >> > > Primarily back then it was just BB. Now with inflation a much wider range > of problems have been solved, and it is supported by CMB data. > > LC >
*Has anyone proposed a Cold BB, which seems illogical since one can imagine an expanding universe backward in time; that is, contracting and getting denser and hotter? AG * > > >> >>> On Friday, October 9, 2020 at 2:19:36 AM UTC-5 [email protected] >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/10/08/no-roger-penrose-we-see-no-evidence-of-a-universe-before-the-big-bang/#20f18bb97a0f >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4918da93-ea21-4637-bcd8-ceb3e2072748o%40googlegroups.com.
