On Sunday, November 1, 2020 at 6:15:46 AM UTC-6 PGC wrote:

> On Sunday, November 1, 2020 at 2:25:34 AM UTC+1 Brent wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10/31/2020 4:21 PM, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> For this reason I do not become particularly angry if someone tells me 
>> they accept global warming as real science, but think we really do not need 
>> to do anything about it. At least that is an opinion honestly expressed. If 
>> on the other hand people try to say it is fake-science and all a hoax and 
>> so forth, that gets my anger level up. The reason is because it is a lie, 
>> and this lie is being expressed to convince other people of it. My general 
>> sense of opinions of this form is based on what I see according to empathy 
>> and a sense of my connectedness to others. For that reason I have liberal 
>> proclivities. For those who dismiss these things and think everything 
>> should be economic, well that is an opinion and I can accept that.
>>
>> The reason it is difficult to dismiss global warming is the assumption 
> that science, our descriptions of nature in particular, and culture can be 
> neatly separated. Popular, scientific, specialist, and political discourses 
> are entangled to such a degree that such separations appear artificial and 
> unsuccessful. If you can point towards literature and/or bodies of thought 
> that accomplish such a feat, say in some sociological or political 
> approach, please share.  
>

I am not referencing anything in the sociology field. I really do not know 
a lot about that. I am just making some distinction. If science tells you 
about impacts and transfer of momentum you might infer that caution is 
advised in crossing a street with traffic. It is not that Newtonian 
mechanics proves anything about safety. It would agree that these 
inferences can be wise or unwise.

LC
 

>
>> But purely transactional, economic relations are inconsistent with the 
>> fact that humans are social animals and live and die by social organization.
>>
>> Brent
>> "No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the 
>> continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe 
>> is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a manor of thy 
>> friend's or of thine own were: any man's death diminishes me, because I am 
>> involved in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom the bell 
>> tolls; it tolls for thee."
>>     --- John Donne, 1623 Nunc Lento Sonitu Dicunt, Morieris
>>
>
> The individual in the Hobbesian view relates that one individual wants 
> what another has, with both in a territorial dispute over the same things, 
> justifying the competition to pursue their selfish ends to establish rights 
> to property, nature, and social dominance. With Rousseau, the state of 
> nature is a powerful fiction that arises out of what Marx called "political 
> economy". Jean Starobinski on Rousseau posits one individual in this scene: 
> the self-sufficient, without dependency, saturated in self-love yet without 
> any need for another. 
>
> Marx attacked this part of the state of nature hypothesis that establishes 
> the individual as primary; in *Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 
> 1844 *he employs Robinson Crusoe irony of placing ourselves in a "fictive 
> primordial state like a political economist trying to clarify things... We 
> proceed from a present fact of political economy". 
>
> Conceptions of the individual can be fruitfully questioned as to what can 
> or cannot be imagined. The subject would make a nice book; particularly 
> trying to compare and contrast these conceptions from antique to present 
> with the conceptions that authoritarians imply, and weighing the evidence 
> that such conceptions are a mere inconsistent propagandistic-opportunistic 
> prop, or whether something more stable is emerging in the world of 
> information age discourse in the wake of our most recent streak of electing 
> supposedly strong men. PGC
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d6741940-4342-4c35-b361-94b8057bde28n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to