NZ also has a "somewhat" smaller population, and I have yet to see any 
proposals that seem to indicate what makes the difference with infections. 
between nations? My suspicion is yeah, rallies and meetups without mouth 
coverings, but in the US surely, our riots and "protests," all being potential 
mass spreading events, to say the least. Now this doesn't explain France, nor, 
the UK now gone back into lockdown with expanding rates of the Wuhan. No great 
rioting there, but here it is a consistent thing.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-54716993
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-54763956
The US, because of who is president, is the only focus on this plague, as if 
the rest of the world is doing fine. Not true. I shall see if this tactic works 
with the electorate here. 


-----Original Message-----
From: Bruno Marchal <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sun, Nov 1, 2020 3:50 am
Subject: Re: New Zealand votes to legalize euthanasia for terminally ill 
patients



On 30 Oct 2020, at 11:42, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
And for the last three weeks the 18.7 acres around the White House has reported 
more COVID-19 cases than the entire country of New Zealand, I guess New 
Zealanders are just more civilized and competent than Americans.  
New Zealand votes to legalize euthanasia for terminally ill patients



I have been an advocate of euthanasia for a long time, until the law pass and 
in my country (Belgium), euthanasia has been fully legalised. But then eight 
young person have been euthanazied for reason of depression, without at least 
try salvia divinorum or tabernanthe iboga, which are known to cure severe 
depression (for published clinical trials). 
So, my current position is that euthanasia + prohibition = murder.
The amazing thing is that New Zealand has made a referendum on both both 
euthanasia, and the legalisation of cannabis, and they have vote in favour of 
euthanasia, but against the legalisation of cannabis. Euthanasia for lack of 
medication makes no sense with prohibition laws (which makes no sense at all 
per se, except for criminals easy money).
Better to defend the right of suicide, without invoking any medical condition, 
in that case…
Bruno



John K Clark


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv1buZc5o3C6QyW_6%3DEWyUnLq_k86g58boLNz1UEBXGNmg%40mail.gmail.com.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CD84CA82-9DA6-47A3-9D8A-AA9FBC0D3970%40ulb.ac.be.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/32068594.1046215.1604241875378%40mail.yahoo.com.

Reply via email to