*One of the features of Trumpism and Trump physics is Alzheimer's onset. 
You made the claim, many times, that "measurement" is an ambiguous concept, 
as well as "observer". AG*
On Sunday, January 31, 2021 at 5:41:45 AM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 7:07 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> *> For the double slit, say, a measurement occurs when a particle hits the 
>> screen (time and location).*
>
>
> That's exactly what many worlds says, a measurement, if for some reason 
> you'd like to use that word, is a change made in the universe and it 
> doesn't matter if that changes made in a conscious being or not. In one 
> universe the photon hits the screen at point X, and in another universe the 
> photon hits the screen at point Y, and in yet another universe the photon 
> doesn't hit the screen at all because it doesn't pass through either slit. 
> If there happens to be an observer watching all this he splits too, and 
> they all have different memories about what happened.  And it doesn't 
> matter if nobody is watching, the universe splits anyway. In many worlds if 
> you like you could replace the word "measurement" with the word "change" 
> and you don't need to use the word "observer" at all, so you don't need to 
> ponder the question of if a cockroach can observe things and make the 
> universe split. But what I don't understand is if you already knew what a 
> "measurement" is why did you ask me where the measurement is?  And I 
> don't care what an "observer" is because it has nothing to do with many 
> worlds.     
>
>   John K Clark     See my new list at  Extropolis 
> <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/77862f77-3526-4e04-b4da-a401da8dea0en%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to