Seemingly the most totalitarian and anti-intellectual places in the United 
States and Canada now are on university campuses these institutions are funded 
by public monies and even so free speech is considered unwelcome most of the 
time on these campuses because they're seen as disruptive, or racist, or 
somehow just plain bad. In other words ideas and concepts can't be rationally 
discussed anymore because they offend the ideologically driven left basically 
liberals socialists who tend aside with the old Soviet socialism as a ideology 
as a way of life. I'm not sure what the Royal society would have to say about 
that all I do know is that both Stalin and Hitler were very bad guys and only 
one of them got eliminated unfortunately. Chairman Mao took up both in a way 
Stalin and Hitler's methodology and mindset but did it mostly to their own 
Chinese people.I wonder if this royal society paper is actually scientific in 
nature or is it instead ideological? Because of it is ideological as it might 
be, then possibly it's a way of doing what the initiators of the Holocaust did 
and begin to dehumanize the people they don't like in this case nationalist and 
conservatives as stated in the paper. So if they're going to dehumanization 
route to make it easier to kill us, this gives me pause interesting article 
though!

On Thursday, February 25, 2021 Lawrence Crowell 
<[email protected]> wrote:
Abstract
Although human existence is enveloped by ideologies, remarkably little is 
understood about the relationships between ideological attitudes and 
psychological traits. Even less is known about how cognitive 
dispositions—individual differences in how information is perceived and 
processed— sculpt individuals' ideological worldviews, proclivities for 
extremist beliefs and resistance (or receptivity) to evidence. Using an 
unprecedented number of cognitive tasks (n = 37) and personality surveys (n = 
22), along with data-driven analyses including drift-diffusion and Bayesian 
modelling, we uncovered the specific psychological signatures of political, 
nationalistic, religious and dogmatic beliefs. Cognitive and personality 
assessments consistently outperformed demographic predictors in accounting for 
individual differences in ideological preferences by 4 to 15-fold. Furthermore, 
data-driven analyses revealed that individuals’ ideological attitudes mirrored 
their cognitive decision-making strategies. Conservatism and nationalism were 
related to greater caution in perceptual decision-making tasks and to reduced 
strategic information processing, while dogmatism was associated with slower 
evidence accumulation and impulsive tendencies. Religiosity was implicated in 
heightened agreeableness and risk perception. Extreme pro-group attitudes, 
including violence endorsement against outgroups, were linked to poorer working 
memory, slower perceptual strategies, and tendencies towards impulsivity and 
sensation-seeking—reflecting overlaps with the psychological profiles of 
conservatism and dogmatism. Cognitive and personality signatures were also 
generated for ideologies such as authoritarianism, system justification, social 
dominance orientation, patriotism and receptivity to evidence or alternative 
viewpoints; elucidating their underpinnings and highlighting avenues for future 
research. Together these findings suggest that ideological worldviews may be 
reflective of low-level perceptual and cognitive functions.




The original article is here:

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2020.0424


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/c82c8b17-3ce6-467f-a94d-b16b11f22919n%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1906912595.2000673.1614276236022%40mail.yahoo.com.

Reply via email to