On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 7:46 PM Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> wrote:

*> I think John's trouble here is that he still adheres to David Deutsch's
> concept of worlds. Deutch talks as though every component of a
> superposition is a separate world. This leaves Deutsch no language to talk
> about decohered worlds, pointer states, and all the other usual apparatus
> of quantum interpretations.*
>

Not so, "superposition" is just a word that means a collection of particles
that exist in very different physical states at exactly the same time, in
other words it's a word that people like to use when they just don't want
to say that the universe has split.  In Many Worlds if the mathematics says
that 2 things could happen then 2 things do happen. Usually when a universe
splits the two never recombine again, that's why we usually don't see weird
quantum effects in our everyday lives, and that's why making a Quantum
Computer is hard. But If the difference between universes is very very
small then a skilled experimenter can make them become identical again and
recombine, and that produces interference. However the difference between
the universes rapidly grows larger and the task of making them identical
again rapidly becomes more difficult, so when the difference becomes larger
than the microscopic level the possibility of them becoming identical again
becomes ridiculously small, like in classical physics and the possibility
that by pure random chance all the air molecules in the room you're in
right now will go to the other side of the room and you'll suffocate to
death. That's why you never see somebody as large as a human being use
quantum tunneling to walk through a brick wall even though such a thing is
theoretically possible.

We don't always see a superposition of states, in fact usually we don't. If
you flip a coin and it comes out heads then you are NOT living in the world
where it came out tails. In a roughly similar  way if you do the two slit
experiment and see that the photon goes through slit A then you are not
living in the world where the photon went through slot B. But the 2 slit
experiment can be a little different from the simple coin toss example.

If after the universe splits and the photon goes through both slits they
then hits a photographic plate (or a brick wall) then both photons in both
universes are destroyed and thus there is no longer any difference between
the two, so the universes will merge back together. Then and only then you
will see evidence that the photon went through both slits (aka.
Interference) on the photographic plate even if you send the photos through
one at a time.

If you got rid of the film (or the brick wall) and let the photon head out into
infinite space after it passes the slits then the two universes will never
recombine, and so of course you will never see a interference effect. The
beautiful part of the theory is that it doesn't have to explain what an
observer is and that's why a brick wall will work just as well as a
photographic plate.

A measurement, if for some reason you'd like to use that word, is a change
made in the universe, and it doesn't matter if that change is made in a
conscious being or not. In one universe the photon hits the screen at point
X, and in another universe the photon hits the screen at point Y, and in
yet another universe the photon doesn't hit the screen at all because it
doesn't pass through either slit. If there happens to be an observer
watching all this he splits too, and they all have different memories about
what happened.  And it doesn't matter if nobody is watching, the universe
splits anyway. In Many Worlds if you like you could replace the word
"measurement" with the word "change" and you don't need to use the word
"observer" at all, so you don't need to ponder the question of if a
cockroach can observe things and make the universe split.

John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
v42

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0qzCfPzMkNH3w-U_DOx3xN4EZZ%2BDLAdG8pJ_%2B64wXs-A%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to